RBFF

General

Randomized Comparison Of Three High-Flux Dialyzers During High

Di: Amelia

MCO dialyzers may improve patient-reported outcomes, particularly the physical components of QOL and uremic pruritus, in patients with high-flux dialyzers. Randomized comparison of three high-flux dialyzers during high volume online hemodiafiltration – the comPERFORM study Article Full-text available Oct 2021

Choosing a dialyzer: What clinicians need to know

We investigated time-resolving molecular weight retention changes among synthetic high-flux dialyzers and compared the results with recent data from a randomized During the period of MCO membrane usage, our findings indicated that the use of MCO dialyzers led to distinct metabolomic and proteomic profiles compared to high-flux dialyzers.

Dialyzer Reuse and Outcomes of High Flux Dialysis

We investigated time-resolving molecular weight retention changes among synthetic high-flux dialyzers and compared the results with recent data from a randomized controlled trial.

Methods Hemocompatibility of various high-flux polysulfone dialyzers were compared in two consecutive, prospective, randomized, crossover studies, each including 24 adult patients Medium were compared cut‐off (MCO) dialyzers were designed to provide better clearance of uremic toxins. We conducted a meta‐analysis comparing MCO with high‐flux (HF) dialyzers for the effect on

Manuela Kempkes-Koch’s 3 research works with 10 citations and 443 reads, including: Randomized comparison of three high-flux dialyzers during high volume online Conclusions high flux dialyzers during High-flux hemodialysis was associated with a lower relative risk of cardiovascular mortality in elderly MHD patients. High-flux hemodialysis did not improve all

Abstract Introduction: Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and hemodialysis (HD) using high-performance membranes such as adsorptive, medium cut-off (MCO), and super high-flux This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was

  • -Characteristics of the dialyzers.
  • -Comparison of dialysis parameters during the 4 different sessions.
  • Clinical performance comparison of two medium cut‐off dialyzers
  • Choosing a dialyzer: What clinicians need to know

Randomized comparison of three high-flux dialyzers during high volume online hemodiafiltration – the comPERFORM study, Clinical Kidney Journal; sfab196. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfab196 This new generation of dialyzers is termed middle cut off dialyzers, to differentiate them from high-cut off dialyzer membranes which lead to

Background: Dialyzers should be designed to efficiently eliminate uraemic toxins during dialysis treatment, given that the accumulation of small and middle molecular weight uraemic solutes is

MCO dialyzers may improve patient-reported outcomes, particularly the physical components of QOL and uremic pruritus, in patients with high-flux dialyzers. Flow diagram of

Randomized comparison of three high-flux dialyzers during high volume online hemodiafiltration – the comPERFORM study Article Full-text available Oct 2021

high-flux.pptx

Randomized comparison of three high-flux dialyzers during high volume online hemodiafiltration – the comPERFORM study Article Full-text available Oct 2021 Type I dialyzers correspond to low-flux membrane dialyzers, types II and III to high-flux membrane dialyzers, and types IV and V to protein This study assessed the large uremic toxin removal ability of a high-flux dialyzer (FX CorDiax 60) specifically designed to facilitate convective therapies compared with a

Helixone ® plus Focus sulla rimozione delle medie molecole, quali la β 2 -microglobulina

IntroductionNew generation helixone dialyzers has recently been developed as part of the ongoing Randomized comparison of three high-flux dialyzers during high-volume online hemodiafiltration—the comPERFORM study Götz Ehlerding1, Wolfgang Ries2, Manuela We investigated time-resolving molecular weight retention changes among synthetic high-flux dialyzers and compare the results with recent data from a randomized controlled trial.

Conclusions Hemodialysis using super high-flux dialyzers might reduce mortality. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to clarify whether these type V dialyzers can improve prognosis.

  • High-Flux and Low-Flux Membranes: Efficacy in Hemodialysis
  • Differences and similarities between the two dialyzers
  • Manuela Kempkes-Koch’s research works
  • Ansgar Erlenkötter’s research works

P-values relate to the descriptive significance of differences between the means of the three treatment groups (two-sided tests). *Not calculated, as datasets were identical between groups Background Survival is equivalent between super high-flux hemodialysis (SHF-HD) and online hemodiafiltration (OHDF) with similar albumin leakage. According to the 2013

MCO dialyzers have a higher permeability and have increased convective transport because of their significant amount of internal filtration 19, so they can potentially improve the

We demonstrated that the performance of high-flux dialyzers was different among the types and that not all high-flux dialyzers should be considered equal.

Introduction: Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and hemodialysis (HD) using high-performance membranes such as adsorptive, medium cut-off (MCO), and super high-flux We investigated time-resolving molecular weight retention changes among synthetic high-flux dialyzers and compare the results with recent data from a randomized Data were analyzed using SPSS version 13 and descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t test for comparison of KT/V, URR and

The outcomes achieved using these new hydrophilic high-flux dialyzers validate that their application in the HD modality yields inferior results compared to HDF. Background Dialyzers the 4 different sessions should be designed to efficiently eliminate uraemic toxins during dialysis treatment, given that the accumulation of small and middle molecular weight uraemic solutes is

New generation helixone dialyzers has recently been developed as part of the ongoing effort to improve dialyzer hemocompatibility and avoid adverse reactions to synthetic

Outcome data reporting benefit compared to low flux dialyzers are predominantly from observational reports and post hoc analysis. 7 – 9 Over time, cost differentials have BACKGROUND: of online attention that Dialyzers should be designed to efficiently eliminate uraemic toxins during dialysis treatment, given that the accumulation of small and middle molecular weight uraemic